The canon, or rather the introduction to it made by Aurelius of Carthage, says a lot about the situation in the Catholic Church in Africa at the end of the fourth century: in many communities there are no higher clerics, "not even deacons". Accidentally, Aurelius informs us that "literacy" (whatever this may have meant – but most probably simply the ability to read!) was not a condition sine qua non for becoming a deacon (it may be presumed that presbyters were meant to be better educated). The description of the penury of clerics stands in sharp contrast with our habitual image of the African Church, influenced by the staggering number of bishops (nearly three hundred confirmed on various occasions), which makes us think of a bishop in every possible place. Apparently, this was not the case.
This was one of the reasons for the benevolent attitude of Catholic bishops towards Donatist clerics who wanted to pass to their communion "with their peoples and honours". This was certainly the case for bishops and presbyters, and possibly also deacons: it is hard to imagine lower clerics being described as having their "peoples".
Aurelius is conscious, however, that too lenient a policy towards ex-Donatist clerics may meet with the disapproval of the bishop of Rome.
The notice about the council is also interesting inasmuch as it presents the council as the affair of the bishops, "in the presence of deacons", with no notice about presbyters.